Ethical Dilemma Worksheet Essay

Include any important potential economic, social, or political pressures, and exclude inconsequential facts. The most important fact around this case is that officeholders never saw the manful suspect crusade mend intoxicated. The fact that two different jurisprudence sketchs were make one stating the military officer saw the male effort and the other stating officer did not cast the male driving. Identify from each one claimant (key actor) who has an interest in the effect of this estimable issue.From the perspective of the honourable agentive rolethe individual contemplating an ethical course of proceedingwhat obligation is owed to the claimant? Why? Claimant Obligation (owed to thePerspective (What does the claimant hope forget witness? ) (key actor) claimant) Officer Rook Designated officer to Officer Rook wrote the original natural fairness report and determineed policy and turned it in to write original report the D. A. ffice to let the proces s begin for the individual male arrested for driving eon intoxicated. D. D. A. Acute To ensure that laws be upheld and the process D. D. A. notices the differences between both police reports and make notes of them. serves all parties The D. D. A. has the responsibility to uphold all laws and rights of individuals and involved. wants to ensure that the condemnable justice system is just and fair. Officer Nixon Turning in atomic number 42 Officer Nixon turned in the second the police report that made note that the officers police report saw the individual male driving. This officer wants a conviction of the individual male for driving opus intoxicated. married woman Wants to take husband Wife wants to take husband home later on being processed. Wife reported that her husband home had bad experiences while in Somalia and it would trump for him to go home. Evaluating Alternatives What are two selections for the scenario? One resource can be a wild ca rd that you ordinarily whitethorn not consider an option because of potential implications. Both should be deep down destitute will and control of the same moral agent. Alternative A Alternative B Use report without seeing intoxicated male driving Use report with seeing intoxicated male driving Respond to the following questions found on your developed substitutes. Alternative A Alternative B What are the scoop- and worst-case scenarios if you choose this Best-Original report is used charges are Best-male is convicted of driving while alternative? dropped. intoxicated Worst- the male individual is drug through Worse-Male is convicted of driving while the criminal justice system and revenue enhancement payer intoxicated.The original police report is money is wasted. never shared out bequeath anyone be slandered if this No harm will come. Yes harm may come when convicted and sentence to alternative is chosen? If so, how serve time incarcerated. will th ey be harmed? Consider families and derivative effects. Would honoring an idea or valuesuch as personal, professional, or No Yes religiousmake the alternative invalid? Are there any patterns, laws, or principles that support the Yes the law of needing to see the driver of no alternative?Are there rules, laws, driving while intoxicated. or principles that make the alternative invalid? State the rule or principle and indicate if it invalidates or supports the alternative. Applying Ethical Guidelines Consider each ethical guideline and explain whether it would support or reject your alternative. Guidelines based on the action itself Alternative A Alternative B Should this alternative become a rule or policy that everyone in this in that location is law in place to avoidNo, this is wrong and situation should follow in similar situations in the future? (Kant) making arrests like this. unethical Does this alternative result in using any person as a means to an endNo Yes the Officer Nixon wrote a without friendship for his or her basic integrity? Kant) bad report and is using the romance system to enforce his false report Is the intent of this action free from vested interest or ulterior Yes No, conviction is wanted motive? Kants good will) Does this alternative demonstrate a genuine concern for others No No affected by the decision, and is the moral agency responding to a sensed need? Guidelines based on consequences Alternative A Alternative B Is the good hat results from this alternative outweighed by the Yes, the good being that the No, garble reports is potential harm that might be done to others? (Mills harm principle) charges are dropped. unethical and can have rippling effects on all officers. Is any harm brought about by anyone other than the moral agent? No Yes, the husband and the (causal harm) rookie officer who wrote the first report. Will anyone be harmed who can be said to be defenseless? No No (paternalism) To what degree is this alternative based on the moral agents own This is the truthful report This should never be used, best interest? (ethical egoism) and should be used regardless based on it being falsified. of the outcomes. Which alternative will generate the greatest benefitor the least Because this alternative is amount of harmfor the greatest number of people? take away only one the truth it will only have alternative. (utilitarianism) the best possible outcome. Ethical Decision Making Choose to proceed with either Alternative A or Alternative B and explain the reasons for your decision. I would go with alternative A, because it is the truth and the original report turned in. I would allow the court system work their process and except the outcome reached. I would then address the facts of a falsified police report and the officer who tried to used it.